4.6 Article

Deactivation studies of the SCR of NOx with hydrocarbons on Co-mordenite monolithic catalysts

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL
卷 341, 期 1-2, 页码 26-34

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2007.12.032

关键词

hydrocarbon-SCR; monolithic catalysts; CoMOR; deactivation; cobalt characterization; UV-vis; Raman

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The catalytic reduction of NO. with hydrocarbons (butane or methane) on CoMOR washcoated monolithic catalysts was studied in the presence of steam and excess oxygen. The significant changes observed in the catalytic behavior of CoMOR powder and monoliths depended essentially on the hydrocarbon nature (carbon number) and the concentration of water in the feed. When the reducing agent was methane, a low concentration of water (2%) decreased the NO to N-2 conversion. However, when butane was used instead of methane, the maximum NO, conversions increased from 50 to 58% and from 52 to 64% for the CoMOR powder and monolith, respectively. The presence of water inhibited the NO adsorption when the reducing agent was methane but when butane was used, water helped to remove the surface-carbon deposits as indicated by TPO and XPS results. This fact explains the increase observed in the NOx conversion. The characterization with TPR and UV-vis spectroscopy showed that the main Co species present in the selective catalysts were the Co(II) ions exchanged at different sites of the mordenite and highly dispersed CoxOy moieties. More rigorous reaction conditions, i.e. 10% of water, led to the irreversible deactivation with both reductants. The Co3O4 phase was detected in all the deactivated powder and monolithic catalysts. The Co3O4 Spinel was formed from the cobalt ion migration, which was promoted in wet atmosphere. In addition, for monolithic catalysts washcoated with CoMOR, the silica binder inhibited the water deactivation effect probably due to the silica-cobalt interaction, as a CoxOySi silicate. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据