4.3 Article

Short-term effect of oil supplementation of complementary food on total ad libitum consumption in 6-to 10-month-old breastfed Indian infants

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.WNO.0000161659.83648.7F

关键词

breast feeding; complementary feeding; energy density; infant; oil supplementation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To evaluate the short term effect of oil supplementation of complementary food on total ad libitum consumption in breastfed infants. Methods: Twenty infants between 6 to 10 months of age were studied in a tertiary hospital in New Delhi for 48 hours. They were given three semi-solid complementary feeds per day and ad libitum breastfeeding. No other food or fluid was allowed during, the study period A traditional gruel made of rice and pulses with high energy density (oil added; caloric density = 35 kcal/100 g) or low energy density (without oil; caloric density = 20 kcal/100 a) was offered in a randomized manner on consecutive days to all infants. Total caloric intake front breast milk and semi-solids was computed for each day. Results: Infants consumed an equivalent amount of semi-solid (mean difference. 10.75 g/day: 95% confidence interval, 10.56 to 32.06; P = 0.304) and a lower amount of breast milk (mean difference, 121.1 g/day; 95% confidence interval, 35.13 to 207.16; P = 0.008) when high energy density feeds were offered. Although the caloric intake from semi-solids increased significantly (18.9 kcal/day; 95% confidence interval, 12.9 to 24.8: P < 0.001) with the high density diet, the total caloric intake (breast milk and study feeds) decreased (mean difference 59.6 kcal/day; 95% confidence interval, 5.95 to 113.34; P 0.031). An inverse relationship was found between caloric density of semi-solids and breast milk intake (r = 0.34, r' = 0.12, P = 0.032). Conclusion: In the short term, oil supplementation of complementary food in breastfed infants does not translate into enhanced total caloric intake, primarily as a result of breast milk displacement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据