4.6 Article

Inhaled nitric oxide enhances distal lung growth after exposure to Hyperoxia in neonatal rats

期刊

PEDIATRIC RESEARCH
卷 58, 期 1, 页码 22-29

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1203/01.PDR.0000163378.94837.3E

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL 68702, HL 57149] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exposure of newborn rats to hyperoxia impairs alveolarization and vessel growth, causing abnormal lung structure that persists during infancy. Recent studies have shown that impaired angiogenesis due to inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling decreases alveolar and vessel growth in the developing lung, and that nitric oxide (NO) mediates VEGF-dependent angiogenesis. The purpose of this study was to determine whether hyperoxia causes sustained reduction of lung VEGF, VEGF receptor, or endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) expression during recovery, and whether inhaled NO improves lung structure in infant rats after neonatal exposure to hyperoxia. Newborn rat pups were randomized to hyperoxia [fraction of inspired oxygen (Fio(2)), 1.00] or room air exposure for 6 d, and then placed in room air with or without inhaled NO (10 ppm) for 2 wk. Rats were then killed for studies, which included measurements of body weight, lung weight, right ventricular hypertrophy (RVH), morphometric analysis of alveolarization (by mean linear intercept (MLI), radial alveolar counts (RAC), and vascular volume (Vv), and immunostaining and Western blot analysis. In comparison with controls, neonatal hyperoxia reduced body weight, increased MLI, and reduced RAC in infant rats. Lung VEGF, VEGFR-2. and eNOS protein expression were reduced after hyperoxia. Inhaled NO treatment after hyperoxia increased body weight and improved distal lung growth. as demonstrated by increased RAC and Vv and decreased MLI. We conclude that neonatal hyperoxia reduced lung VEGF expression. which persisted during recovery in room air, and that inhaled NO restored distal lung growth in infant rats after neonatal hyperoxia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据