4.6 Article

Changing prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux with changing time: Longitudinal study in an Asian population

期刊

JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
卷 20, 期 7, 页码 995-1001

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2005.03887.x

关键词

acid regurgitation; epidemiology; gastroesophageal reflux; heartburn; prevalence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The purpose of the present paper was to study previously obtained population-based data on the prevalence of reflux symptoms in a random sample of community adults in Singapore. This sample was re-investigated 5 years later to determine changes in the prevalence of reflux symptoms. Methods: In 1999, 237 (34%) of the original cohort of 696 persons who were interviewed in 1994, were re-interviewed using a validated Gastrointestinal Symptoms Questionnaire. The original cohort was a race-stratified random sample of residents in a Singaporean town. Reflux was defined as heartburn and/or acid regurgitation occurring at least once a month. Results: Among the 237 respondents (aged 25-89 years; male : female, 49:51; Chinese n = 106, 45%; Malay n = 69, 29%; Indian n = 60, 25%), reflux was reported by 25 respondents, giving a prevalence of 10.5 +/- 2.0%. This compared with the prevalence of 5.5 +/- 1.5% (odds ratio [OR], 2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0-5.2; P = 0.05) among the same 237 respondents in the 1994 survey. Of the 25 subjects who reported reflux in the current survey, 22 (88.0%) did not complain of reflux symptoms in the 1994 survey. The ethnic-adjusted prevalence of reflux in 1999 was estimated to be 9.9 +/- 1.9%. This was an increase above the prevalence in 1994 of 1.6 +/- 1.0% (P = 0.051). The upward trend in the prevalence of reflux was not related to age, smoking, alcohol consumption, or increase in bodyweight. Conclusions: There is a rising trend of reflux symptoms frequency in the general population of Singapore over a 5-year period. (C) 2005 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据