4.0 Article Proceedings Paper

Phenotypic and functional characterization of intestinal epithelial exosomes

期刊

BLOOD CELLS MOLECULES AND DISEASES
卷 35, 期 1, 页码 11-16

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2005.04.001

关键词

mucosal immunity; intestinal epithelial cells; exosomes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intestinal epithelial cells (IEC) are located at a strategic position between the external environment and the most extended lymphoid tissue in the body. Besides their central role in the absorption of nutrients, IEC also provide antigenic information to the immune system and are involved in the balance tolerance/allergy to food antigens. Like professional antigen presenting cells, IEC have been shown to secrete 30- to 90-nm diameter vesicles named exosomes, in a polarized way, either from their apical or basolateral side. These vesicles carry molecules involved in adhesion and antigen presentation, comprising major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and class 11 molecules, tetraspan proteins, CD26/dipeptidyl-peptidase IV, and A33 antigen, a molecule essentially restricted to the intestinal epithelium. Invariant chain, transferrin receptor, and Na-K-ATPase are not expressed on epithelial exosomes. In vivo, in mice, epithelial exosomes carrying MHC/ ovalbumin peptide complexes induce specific immune responses when injected intraperitoneally. A33 antigen, an Ig-like molecule highly specific for intestinal epithelial cells and enriched in epithelial exosomes, is found at the surface of cells entering mesenteric lymph nodes suggesting exosome migration from the epithelial layer to the gut associated lymphoid system. Taken together, intestinal epithelial exosomes released at the basolateral surface of enterocytes could be antigen-carrying structures constituting a link between luminal antigens and the local immune system and acting as sensors of the antigenic information present in the intestinal lumen. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据