4.5 Article

Expression of exogenous human telomerase in cultures of endometrial stromal cells does not alter their hormone responsiveness

期刊

BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION
卷 73, 期 1, 页码 106-114

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.104.035063

关键词

female reproductive tract; steroid hormone receptors; uterus

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA096960] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [ES07017] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the human endometrium, stromal cells mediate the proliferative response of epithelial cells to the steroid hormones estrogen and progesterone. These stromal-epithelial interactions are readily studied in vitro by coculture of both cell types. A major impediment to such studies is the rapid senescence of normal stromal cells. To circumvent this problem, we tested whether human endometrial stromal cells immortalized by expressing a transduced human telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) subunit retained the ability to mediate hormonal control of epithelial proliferation in the coculture assay. We found that the telomerized stromal cells were very similar to the parental strain from which they were derived according to criteria of proliferation, karyotype, cellular localization of cytoskeletal markers and nuclear staining, and basal gene expression based on microarray analysis. We also showed that expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors, as assessed by immunodetection, was similar in both telomerized and parental stromal cells. Importantly, the telomerized stromal cells were shown in coculture assay to be as effective as normal stromal cells in regulating the proliferation of endometrial epithelial cells in response to estrogen or progesterone. The availability of these long-lived stromal cells may advance studies addressing the mechanistic, regulatory, and cell structural basis of stromal-epithelial interactions and hormonal responses in normal, preneoplastic, and neoplastic human endometrial tissue.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据