4.5 Article

D1 dopamine receptors modulate ΔFosB induction in rat striatum after intermittent morphine administration

期刊

出版社

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.083410

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [F31 DA017421, P30 DA13429, T32 DA07237] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Induction of the transcription factor Delta FosB was studied to examine neurochemical adaptations produced by repeated opiate administration. The mechanism of this induction was also investigated. The 35- to 37-kDa isoforms of Delta FosB, also referred to as the chronic Fras, were measured in the nucleus accumbens, caudate putamen, and frontal cortex of male Sprague-Dawley rats after either an acute injection of morphine or an escalating dosing schedule of morphine for 10 days. Heroin was also tested to determine whether the findings extend to other opiates. Results from Western blot analysis using an anti-fosB antibody demonstrate that 10-day intermittent escalating dose morphine produced a significant increase in Delta FosB-immunoreactivity in the nucleus accumbens, caudate putamen and frontal cortex, whereas a single injection of morphine had no effect on Fra immunoreactivity. Heroin administered twice daily for 10 days by an intermittent escalating dose schedule also induced Delta FosB in the caudate putamen, but not in the nucleus accumbens or frontal cortex. Daily pretreatment with the selective D1-like dopamine receptor antagonist SCH 23390 [R-(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepinehydrochloride] significantly blocked morphine-induced Delta FosB induction in the nucleus accumbens and caudate putamen, but not in the frontal cortex. These results demonstrate that morphine-induced Delta FosB upregulation in the striatum, but not in the frontal cortex, is modulated by D1 dopamine receptors, suggesting that the mechanisms involved in the up-regulation of these chronic Fras by morphine is brain region-specific.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据