4.6 Article

Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping at 3 T and 1.5 T Evaluation of Consistency and Reproducibility

期刊

INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY
卷 50, 期 8, 页码 522-530

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000159

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI [25461815]
  2. Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation, Japan [150100700014]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25461815] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives The aim of this study was to assess the consistency and reproducibility of quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) at 3-T and 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR) scanners. Materials and Methods This study was approved by institutional ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained. Twenty-two healthy volunteers underwent 2 examinations on different days. Each examination consisted of MR imaging on both 3-T and 1.5-T MR scanners. The data from both scanners and examination days were obtained, and QSM was calculated with STI Suite using 2 different algorithms-harmonic phase removal using laplacian operator (HARPERELLA) and a sophisticated harmonic artifact reduction for phase data (SHARP) method with a variable radius of the spherical kernel at the brain boundary (V-SHARP). We evaluated consistency of QSM between 3 T and 1.5 T and the reproducibility between the first and second examinations using 2-phase processing methods (HARPERELLA and V-SHARP). Results Susceptibility values of regions of interests at 3 T were highly correlated with those at 1.5 T with good agreement (HARPERELLA, R-2 = 0.838; V-SHARP, R-2 = 0.898) (average difference, +/- 1.96 SD; HARPERELLA, -0.012 +/- 0.046; V-SHARP, -0.002 +/- 0.034). Reproducibility analysis demonstrated excellent correlation between the first and second examination at both 3 T and 1.5 T for both algorithms (HARPERELLA at 3 T, R-2 = 0.921; 1.5 T, R-2 = 0.891; V-SHARP at 3 T, R-2 = 0.937; 1.5 T, R-2 = 0.926). Bland-Altman analysis showed excellent reproducibility for HARPERELLA (3 T, -0.003 +/- 0.032; 1.5 T, -0.003 +/- 0.038) and V-SHARP (3 T, -0.003 +/- 0.027; 1.5 T, -0.003 +/- 0.029). Susceptibility values of these 2 algorithms were highly correlated with good agreement (3T, R-2 = 0.961; 1.5 T, R-2 = 0.931) (3 T, 0.009 +/- 0.023; 1.5 T, -0.003 +/- 0.049). Conclusions Quantitative susceptibility mapping with HARPERELLA and V-SHARP demonstrated good reproducibility at 3 T and 1.5 T, and QSM with V-SHARP demonstrated good consistency at 3 T and 1.5 T.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据