4.7 Article

Antiproliferative and proapoptotic effects of raloxifene on uterine leiomyomas in postmenopausal women

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 84, 期 1, 页码 154-161

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.12.058

关键词

apoptosis; Bax; Bcl-2; leiomyoma; PCNA; raloxifene; SERM

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To study the cell effects of raloxifene on uterine and leiomyoma tissue in postmenopausal women. Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Setting: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Magna Graccia of Catanzaro, Italy. Patient(S): Forty postmenopausal women affected by uterine leiomyomas and selected for hysterectomy. Intervention(s): Treatment for three cycles of 28 days with raloxifene at a dose of 180 mg/day orally (raloxifene group) or placebo tablets (3 tablets/day orally) (placebo group). Main Outcome Measure(s): Uterine and leiomyoma dimensions were measured in each subject at entry and before surgery. On leiomyomas and homologous myometrium the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)positive cells/total cells (PCNA/TQ and the Bcl-2-positive cells/Bax-positive cells (Bcl-2/Bax) ratios (%), as proliferation and apoptotic indexes, respectively, were measured. Result(S): After treatment, uterine and leiomyoma sizes were significantly changed in comparison with baseline and the placebo group. PCNA/TC and Bcl-2/Bax ratios were significantly higher in leiomyomas than in homologous myometrium. A significant difference was detected in PCNA/TC between the myometrium of the raloxifene and control groups, whereas no difference was observed in the Bcl-2/Bax ratio. A significant difference in PCNAITC and Bcl-2/Bax ratios was detected in leiomyoma tissue between the raloxifene group and controls. Conclusion(s): In postmenopausal women, raloxifene administration reduces uterine Iciomyomas by exerting a cell antiproliferative and proapoptotic action. (c) 2005 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据