4.1 Article

Marked variation in oxycodone pharmacokinetics in infants

期刊

PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA
卷 15, 期 7, 页码 560-565

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2005.01571.x

关键词

oxycodone; pharmacokinetics; pharmacology; infants

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The pharmacokinetics of oxycodone (13-hydroxy-7,8-dihydrocodeinone) has been studied in adults and in children who are older than 6 months but there is no information on the disposition of oxycodone in neonates and young infants. The aim of this study was to study the pharmacokinetics of oxycodone in infants varying in age from 0 to 6 months. Methods: Twenty-two infants undergoing surgery were given postoperatively an intravenous bolus of 0.1 mg.kg(-1) of oxycodone hydrochloride. Ten of the patients were younger than 1 week (group 1), six from 1 week to 2 months (group 2) and six from 2 to 6 months (group 3). Plasma samples were collected for the analysis of oxycodone concentrations up to 24 h. Pharmacokinetics were characterized by noncompartmental methods. Results: The median (range) values for the clearance (Cl) were 9.9 (2.3-17.2), 20.1 (3.7-40.4) and 15.4 (14.8-80.2) ml.min(-1).kg(-1) in the above three groups. The values for volume of distribution at steady-state were 3.3 (1.9-4.7), 5.6 (1.3-8.5) and 3.2 (1.8-6.0) l.kg(-1) and for elimination half-life (t(1/2)) 4.4 (2.4-14.1), 3.6 (1.6-11.6) and 2.0 (0.8-3.9) h, respectively. Both Cl (r = 0.46) and half-life (r = -0.46) were correlated to the age of the patient (P < 0.05). There were 13 patients who were on mechanical ventilation at the time of oxycodone administration. None of the spontaneously breathing infants had hypoventilation which required assistance during the study. Conclusions: The values for Cl and t(1/2) varied greatly between the subjects. This variability was most pronounced in the two youngest groups. Routine dosing of oxycodone in young infants may be dangerous. The dose of oxycodone must be titrated individually.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据