4.6 Article

Reproductive allocation of biomass and nitrogen in annual and perennial Lesquerella crops

期刊

ANNALS OF BOTANY
卷 96, 期 1, 页码 127-135

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mci158

关键词

Lesquerella fendleri; allocation; partitioning; allometry; annuals; perennials; new crops; oil-seed crops; grain crops

向作者/读者索取更多资源

center dot Background and Aims The use of perennial crops could contribute to increase agricultural sustainability. However, almost all of the major grain crops are herbaceous annuals and opportunities to replace them with more long-lived perennials have been poorly explored. This follows the presumption that the perennial life cycle is associated with a lower potential yield, due to a reduced allocation of biomass to grains. The hypothesis was tested that allocation to perpetuation organs in the perennial L. mendocina would not be directly related to a lower allocation to seeds. center dot Methods Two field experiments were carried on with the annual Lesquerella fendleri and the iteroparous perennial L. mendocina, two promising oil-seed crops for low-productivity environments, subjected to different water and nitrogen availability. center dot Key Results Seed biomass allocation was similar for both species, and unresponsive to water and nitrogen availability. Greater root and vegetative shoot allocation in the perennial was counterbalanced by a lower allocation to other reproductive structures compared with the annual Lesquerella. Allometrie relationships revealed that allocation differences between the annual and the perennial increased linearly with plant size. The general allocation patterns for nitrogen did not differ from those of biomass. However, nitrogen concentrations were higher in the vegetative shoot and root of L. mendocina than of L fendleri but remained stable in seeds of both species. center dot Conclusions It is concluded that vegetative organs are more hierarchically important sinks in L. mendocina than in the annual L fendleri, but without disadvantages in seed hierarchy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据