4.7 Article

Effects of spatial and temporal resolution for MR image-guided thermal ablation of prostate with transurethral ultrasound

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 109-118

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20339

关键词

MRI; SNR; resolution; prostate; ultrasound; thermometry

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R33 CA88205, T32 CA09695] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [RR 09784] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To describe approaches for determining optimal spatial and temporal resolutions for the proton resonance frequency shift method of quantitative magnetic resonance temperature imaging (MRTI) guidance of transurethral ultrasonic prostate ablation. Materials and Methods: Temperature distributions of two transurethral ultrasound applicators (90 degrees sectored tubular and planar arrays) for canine prostate ablation were measured via MRTI during in vivo sonication, and agree well with two-dimensional finite difference model simulations at various spatial resolutions. Measured temperature distributions establish the relevant signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) range for thermometry in an interventional MR scanner. and are reconstructed at different resolutions to compare resultant temperature measurements. Various temporal resolutions are calculated by averaging MRTI frames. Results: When noise is added to simulated temperature distributions for tubular and planar applicators, the minimum root mean squared (RMS) error is achieved by reconstructing to pixel sizes of 1.9 and 1.7 mm, respectively. In in vivo measurements, low spatial resolution MRTI data are shown to reduce the noise without significantly affecting thermal dose calculations. Temporal resolution of 0.66 frames/minute leads to measurement errors of more than 12 degrees C during rapid heating. Conclusion: Optimizing MRTI pixel size entails balancing large pixel SNR gain with accuracy in representing underlying temperature distributions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据