4.6 Article

Retinal Ganglion Cells Thinning in Eyes With Nonproliferative Idiopathic Macular Telangiectasia Type 2A

期刊

INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE
卷 56, 期 2, 页码 1416-1422

出版社

ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.14-15672

关键词

idiopathic macular telangiectasia; MacTel; IJRT; retinal ganglion cells; ganglion cells analysis; GCIPL; RNFL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE. To analyze the changes in retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in eyes with nonproliferative macular telangiectasia type 2A (MacTel), by evaluating macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness and macular retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in comparison to age-matched healthy volunteers. METHODS. We performed a retrospective analysis of 99 eyes (53 subjects) with nonproliferative MacTel who underwent fundus fluorescein angiography and spectral domain optical coherence tomography using Cirrus HD-OCT. We also included 44 eyes of 33 age-matched healthy Indian volunteers as control group. Average, minimum, and sectoral GCIPL and RNFL thicknesses were collected. Comparison of GCIPL and RNFL thicknesses between MacTel and control groups was performed using Wilcoxon rank sum test. RESULTS. Eighty-eight eyes of 47 MacTel subjects were included after ensuring good quality of the retinal layers' segmentation. Macular GCIPL thickness was constantly and diffusely reduced in MacTel eyes compared with controls (P < 0.0001 for each GCIPL sector). The mean reduction in average GCIPL thickness was 11%, and the mean reduction in minimum GCIPL thickness was 23%. Similarly, macular RNFL thickness was diffusely reduced in MacTel eyes compared with controls (P < 0.0001 for each RNFL sector), with 13% of mean reduction. CONCLUSIONS. Our study demonstrated that in eyes with nonproliferative MacTel type 2A there was significant and consistent RGCs degeneration, leading to diffuse thinning of RGCs' dendrites, cell bodies, and axons. These findings are suggestive of neurodegeneration in MacTel type 2A.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据