4.4 Article

Disruption of Chlorella vulgaris Cells for the Release of Biodiesel-Producing Lipids: A Comparison of Grinding, Ultrasonication, Bead Milling, Enzymatic Lysis, and Microwaves

期刊

APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 164, 期 7, 页码 1215-1224

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12010-011-9207-1

关键词

Microalga; Lipid concentration; Cell disruption

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20936002]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2007CB707805, 2009CB724700, 2011CB200906]
  3. Fifth of Six Projects Sponsoring Talent Summits of Jiangsu Province [2008-D-63]
  4. College Industrialization Project of Jiangsu Province [JH09-30]
  5. Fok Ying Tung Education Foundation [123014]
  6. Ministry of Education of China [NCET-09-0157]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A comparative evaluation of different cell disruption methods for the release of lipids from marine Chlorella vulgaris cells was investigated. The cell growth of C. vulgaris was observed. Lipid concentrations from different disruption methods were determined, and the fatty acid composition of the extracted lipids was analyzed. The results showed that average productivity of C. vulgaris biomass was 208 mg L(-1) day(-1). The lipid concentrations of C. vulgaris were 5%, 6%, 29%, 15%, 10%, 7%, 22%, 24%, and 18% when using grinding with quartz sand under wet condition, grinding with quartz sand under dehydrated condition, grinding in liquid nitrogen, ultrasonication, bead milling, enzymatic lysis by snailase, enzymatic lysis by lysozyme, enzymatic lysis by cellulose, and microwaves, respectively. The shortest disruption time was 2 min by grinding in liquid nitrogen. The unsaturated and saturated fatty acid contents of C. vulgaris were 71.76% and 28.24%, respectively. The extracted lipids displayed a suitable fatty acid profile for biodiesel [C16:0 (similar to 23%), C16:1 (similar to 23%), and C18:1 (similar to 45%)]. Overall, grinding in liquid nitrogen was identified as the most effective method in terms of disruption efficiency and time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据