4.6 Article

Spectroscopic study of blue compact galaxies V. Oxygen abundance and the metallicity-luminosity relation

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 437, 期 3, 页码 849-859

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041945

关键词

galaxies : abundances; galaxies : starburst; stars : formation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This is the fifth paper in a series studying the stellar components, star formation histories, star formation rates and metallicities of a blue compact galaxy ( BCG) sample. Based on our high- quality ground- based spectroscopic observations, we have determined the electron temperatures, electron densities, nitrogen abundances and oxygen abundances for 72 starforming BCGs in our sample, using different oxygen abundance indicators. The oxygen abundance covers the range 7.15 < 12 + log ( O/ H) < 9.0, and nitrogen is found to be mostly a product of secondary nucleosynthesis for 12 + log ( O/ H) > 8.2 and apparently a product of primary nucleosynthesis for 12 + log ( O/ H) < 8.2. To assess the possible systematic differences among different oxygen abundance indicators, we have compared oxygen abundances of BCGs obtained with the T-e method, R-23 method, P method, N2 method and O3N2 method. The oxygen abundances derived from the Te method are systematically lower by 0.1- 0.25 dex than those derived from the strong line empirical abundance indicators, consistent with previous studies based on H.. region samples. We confirm the existence of the metallicity- luminosity relation in BCGs over a large range of abundances and luminosities. Our sample of galaxies shows that the slope of the metallicity- luminosity relation for the luminous galaxies (similar to- 0.05) is slightly shallower than that for the dwarf galaxies (similar to- 0.17). An offset was found in the metallicity-luminocity relation of the local galaxies and that of the intermediate redshift galaxies. It shows that the metallicity- luminosity relation for the emission line galaxies at high redshift is displaced to lower abundances, higher luminosities, or both.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据