3.8 Article Proceedings Paper

Carbon acquisition mechanisms by planktonic desmids and their link to ecological distribution

出版社

NATL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA
DOI: 10.1139/B05-069

关键词

pH drift; desmids; isolate variation; inorganic carbon acquisition

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To test if different inorganic carbon (C-i) uptake mechanisms underlie the ecological distribution pattern of planktonic desmids, we performed pH-drift experiments with 12 strains, belonging to seven species, originating from lakes of different pH. Staurastrum brachiatum Ralfs and Staurodesmus cuspidatus (Ralfs) Teil. var. curvatus (W. West) Teil., species confined to acidic, soft water habitats, showed remarkably different behavior in the pH drift experiments: S. brachiatum appeared to use CO2 only, whereas Staurodesmus cuspidatus appeared to use HCO3- as well. Staurastrum chaetoceras (Schr.) Smith and Staurastrum planctonicum Teil, species well-known for their abundant occurrence in alkaline waters, were the most effective at using HCO3-. Other species, to be encountered in both slightly acidic and slightly alkaline waters, took an intermediate position. Experiments using specific inhibitors suggested that Cosmarium abbreviatum Rac. var. planctonicum W. & G.S. West and S. brachiatum use CO2 by an active CO2 uptake mechanism, whereas S. chaetoceras and Staurodesmus cuspidatus showed an active HCO3- uptake pattern. Most likely, these active uptake mechanisms make use of H+-ATPase, as none of the desmids expressed significant carbonic anhydrase activity. A series of strains of Staurastrum planctonicum isolated from different habitats, all clustered in between the species using HCO3-, but no further differentiation was observed. Therefore, desmids cannot be simply characterized as exclusive CO2 users, and the ecological distribution pattern of a desmid species does not unequivocally link to a certain C-i uptake mechanism. Nevertheless, there does appear to be a general ecological link between a species' C-i uptake mechanism and its ecological distribution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据