4.7 Article

Methylglyoxal administration induces diabetes-like microvascular changes and perturbs the healing process of cutaneous wounds

期刊

CLINICAL SCIENCE
卷 109, 期 1, 页码 83-95

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/CS20050026

关键词

diabetes; diabetic complication; methylglyoxal; glycation; wound healing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increased formation of MG (methylglyoxal) and related protein glycation in diabetes has been linked to the development of diabetic vascular complications. Diabetes is also associated with impaired wound healing. In the present study, we investigated if prolonged exposure of rats to MG (5075 mg/kg of body weight) induced impairment of wound healing and diabetes-like vascular damage. MG treatment at-rested growth, increased serum creatinine, induced hypercholesterolaemia (all P < 0.05) and irripaired vasodilation (P < 0.01) compared with saline controls. Degenerative changes in cutaneous microvessels with loss of endothelial cells, basement membrane thickening and luminal occlusion were also detected. Acute granulation appeared immature (P < 0.01) and was associated with an impaired infiltration of regenerative cells with reduced proliferative rates (P < 0.01). Immunohistochemical staining indicated the presence of AGEs (advanced glycation end-products) in vascular structures, cutaneous tissue and peripheral nerve fibres. Expression of PAGE (receptor for AGEs) appeared to be increased in the cutaneous vasculature. There were also pro-inflammatory and profibrotic responses, including increased IL-1 beta(interleukin-1 beta) expression in intact epidermis, TNF-alpha (tumour necrosis factor-a) in regions of angiogenesis, CTGF (connective tissue growth factor) in medial layers of arteries, and TGF-beta (transforming growth factor-beta) in glomerular tufts, tubular epithelial cells and interstitial endothelial cells. We conclude that exposure to increased MG in vivo is associated with the onset of microvascular damage and other diabetes-like complications within a normoglycaemic context.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据