4.7 Article

Seawater chemistry, coccolithophore population growth, and the origin of Cretaceous chalk

期刊

GEOLOGY
卷 33, 期 7, 页码 593-596

出版社

GEOLOGICAL SOC AMER, INC
DOI: 10.1130/G21405.1

关键词

coccolithophore; limestone; chalk; calcite; high-Mg calcite

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The magnesium/calcium ratio (Mg/Ca) and calcium (Ca) concentration of seawater have oscillated throughout geologic time; our experiments indicate that these variables have strongly influenced biomineralization and chalk production by coccolithophores. The high Mg/Ca ratio of modern seawater favors precipitation of high-Mg calcite and/or aragonite. In contrast, the low Mg/Ca ratio of imputed Cretaceous seawater favored precipitation of low-Mg calcite. We have discovered that some coccolithophore species today secrete skeletal elements of high-Mg calcite, rather than low-Mg calcite, as conventionally believed. These species incorporated less Mg when the ambient Mg/Ca ratio was lowered, secreting low-Mg calcite in imputed Cretaceous seawater. Calcification stimulates coccolithophore population growth by contributing CO2 to photosynthesis. Three extant coccolithophore species multiplied much faster as the composition of ambient seawater was shifted toward that estimated for Cretaceous seas. Two of these species secreted high-Mg calcite in ambient seawater having Mg/Ca > 1, and incorporation of Mg in a calcite crystal inhibits growth. Calcification of the third species, which secreted low-Mg calcite at all ambient Mg/Ca ratios, is hindered by the high Mg/Ca ratio and low absolute concentration of Ca of modern seawater. We conclude that the ionic composition of Cretaceous seawater enabled coccolithophores to produce massive chalk deposits, and conversely, that the ionic composition of modern seawater inhibits population growth for most extant coccolithophore species, which occupy nutrient-poor waters and fail to respond to fertilization by nitrate, phosphate, or iron.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据