4.7 Article

Thrombotic risk factors in primary antiphospholipid syndrome - A 5-year prospective study

期刊

STROKE
卷 36, 期 7, 页码 1490-1494

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000170645.40562.09

关键词

antiphospholipid syndrome; echocardiography; thrombosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Purpose - Because thromboembolic events are frequently observed in primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS), we assessed the risk factors for new thrombotic episodes. Methods - Fifty-six PAPS patients (mean age, 37 +/- 10 years) were prospectively studied for 5 years. The preliminary Sapporo classification criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS; a medium - high anticardiolipin antibody [aCL] titer and/or a positive lupus anticoagulant [LA] test in the presence of vascular thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity) were used to confirm the diagnosis. Thrombotic episodes or pregnancy losses before a diagnosis of PAPS were considered events, and any new disease manifestation other than thrombocytopenia was considered a recurrent event. Only patients with objectively verified thrombotic events were included in the study. Results - Twenty-one new thrombotic events were observed in 15 subjects (26.8%), including 3 (5.4%) who died during the follow-up. The patients with IgG aCL levels of > 40 IgG phospholipid unit (GPL-U) showed a higher incidence of new thrombotic events (43.3%) than those with levels of <= 40 GPL-U (7.7%). Univariate analysis identified a history of recurrent clinical events (P=0.004), a highly positive aCL titer (P=0.007), and the presence of cardiac abnormalities (P=0.036) as significant risk factors for new thrombotic events. A multivariate regression model confirmed that an IgG aCL titer of <= 40 GPL-U was an independent risk factor for thrombosis (odds ratio, 9.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.83 to 46.05). Conclusions - A high IgG aCL titer is the strongest predictor of new thrombotic events in PAPS patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据