4.5 Article

Serum selenium concentrations in chronic pancreatitis and controls

期刊

DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE
卷 37, 期 7, 页码 522-525

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2005.01.013

关键词

chronic pancreatitis; oxygen free radicals; selenium

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. In the light of the recent hypothesis that one cause of pancreatic damage may be related to the toxic action of oxygen free radicals [Braganza JM. The pathogenesis of pancreatitis. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 199 1; Braganza JM. A framework for the aetiogenesis of chronic pancreatitis. Digestion 1998;59(Suppl. 4):1-12], we were prompted to assess the role of selenium in pancreatic disease. Objective. The objective of the study was to establish whether or not there is any correlation between selenium levels and the degree of impairment of exocrine pancreatic function in patients suffering from chronic pancreatitis. Patients. Two groups of subjects were recruited, the first consisting of 38 patients with clinically quiescent chronic pancreatitis of alcoholic origin and the second of 48 control subjects selected from among healthy volunteers attending our Transfusion Centre. Methods. Body mass index, smoking and drinking habits were evaluated and selenium serum levels were assayed in all subjects. The patients with pancreatic disease were subdivided into three groups on the basis of lipase output assayed with a duodenal probe. Results. Selenium serum levels in the chronic pancreatitis group as a whole were found to be significantly lower than in the control group, but when they were analysed in the three distinct subgroups, a significant difference was found against control group only in the groups with severe and moderate exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. Conclusions. The mean serum selenium levels were lower in chronic pancreatitis patients than control. (C) 2005 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据