4.6 Article

The impact of a primary care physician cooperative on the caseload of an emergency department: The Maastricht integrated out-of-hours service

期刊

JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 20, 期 7, 页码 612-617

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0091.x

关键词

primary care; emergency medicine; gatekeeping; after-hours care

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of an out-of-hours primary care physician (PCP) cooperative on the caseload at the emergency department (ED) and to study characteristics of patients utilizing out-of-hours care. DESIGN: A pre-post intervention design was used. During a 3-week period before and a 3-week period after establishing the PCP cooperative, all patient records with out-of-hours primary and emergency care were analyzed. SETTING: Primary care in Maastricht ( the Netherlands) is delivered by 59 PCPs. Primary care physicians formerly organized out-of-hours care in small locum groups. In January 2000, out- of- hours primary care was reorganized, and a PCP cooperative was established. This cooperative is located at the ED of the University Hospital Maastricht, the city's only hospital, which has no emergency medicine specialists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The number of patients utilizing out- of-hours care, their age and sex, diagnoses, post-ED care, and serious adverse events. RESULTS. After establishing the PCP cooperative, the proportion of patients utilizing emergency care decreased by 53%, and the proportion of patients utilizing primary care increased by 25%. The shift was the largest for patients with musculoskeletal disorders or skin problems. There were fewer hospital admissions, and fewer subsequent referrals to the patient's own PCP and medical specialists. No substantial change in new outpatient visits at the hospital or in mortality occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In the city of Maastricht, the Netherlands, the PCP cooperative reduced the use of hospital emergency care during out-of-hours care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据