4.5 Article

Liver function assessment according to the Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) grade in sorafenib-treated patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

期刊

INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUGS
卷 33, 期 6, 页码 1257-1262

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10637-015-0292-9

关键词

Hepatocellular carcinoma; Sorafenib; The Albumin-Bilirubin grade; Child-Pugh B; Liver function

资金

  1. Bayer Yakuhin Co., Ltd.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) grade has been proposed as a new, simple, and objective method of assessing liver function. However, there is lack of data in sorafenib-treated patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: We evaluated the correlations between the ALBI grade and Child-Pugh score, adverse events, and survival in 89 patients with advanced HCC who were prospectively treated with sorafenib. Results: Majority of patients with ALBI grade 1 (14/15 patients, 93 %) had a Child-Pugh score of 5. Patients with ALBI grade 2 had a wide range of liver function according to the Child-Pugh scores, with scores of 5, 6, 7, and a parts per thousand yen8. We divided ALBI grade 2 patients into ALBI grade 2A and 2B groups according to the median ALBI score among patients with ALBI grade 2. Although no significant difference was observed, the incidence of liver dysfunction in sorafenib-treated patients with ALBI grades 1, 2A, and 2B was 7 %, 19 %, and 35 %, respectively. Overall survival in the ALBI grade 2B group was significantly shorter than that in the ALBI grade 1 and 2A groups. Thus, ALBI grade 2B was an independent predictor of poor prognosis in addition to elevated serum aspartate aminotransferase levels, increased serum alpha-fetoprotein level, and macrovascular invasion. Conclusion: Sorafenib may be indicated for all patients with advanced HCC and ALBI grade 1 and for some with ALBI grade 2. The subdivision of patients with ALBI grade 2 increases the utility of ALBI in identifying patients indicated for sorafenib therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据