4.7 Article

Enhanced nectin-1 expression and herpes oncolytic sensitivity in highly migratory and invasive carcinoma

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 11, 期 13, 页码 4889-4897

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0309

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Although a variety of malignant tumors are susceptible to therapy with oncolytic herpes simplex viruses, the determinants of tumor sensitivity to these viruses are poorly understood. Nectin-1 is a cell surface adhesion molecule that is a component of intercellular adherens junctions and also functions as a herpes viral receptor. Because highly invasive cells may have decreased intercellular adhesion, we sought to determine if such cells might also have altered availability of cell surface nectin-1 to act as a herpes receptor. Experimental Design and Results: A series of squamous cell carcinoma lines of increasing migratory and invasive potential, termed MG1-MG14, were selected by serial passages of murine SCC7 through Matrigel invasion chambers. Available cell surface nectin-1 was enhanced on the MG11 and MG14 cell lines in comparison to SCC7 as measured by cellular ELISA and immunofluorescence microscopy. A replication-competent, oncolytic herpes virus (NV1023) showed an increased ability to enter MG11 and MG14 cells as compared with SCC7 cells. Furthermore, MG11 and MG14 supported increased herpes viral replication and cytotoxicity over SCC7. For all three of the cell lines, viral entry assays revealed that the actively migrating cells were significantly more susceptible to herpes infection than the nonmigrating cells. Conclusions: These results show that malignant cells with highly migratory and invasive properties may exhibit increased cell surface nectin-1 availability, which may serve as a herpes viral receptor to enhance the efficacy of herpes oncolytic therapy. This finding has implications regarding patient selection for future clinical trials using these promising therapeutic vectors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据