4.5 Article

Measuring sociability in dairy cows

期刊

APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE
卷 122, 期 2-4, 页码 84-91

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2009.11.011

关键词

Dairy cattle; Temperament; Sociability; Runway test

资金

  1. UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
  2. National Milk Records
  3. Cattle Information Services
  4. Genus
  5. Cogent
  6. Holstein UK
  7. BOCM Pauls
  8. Dartington Cattle Breeding Trust
  9. RSPCA
  10. Scottish Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sociability is the relative preference of individual animals to seek out close contact with conspecifics. The aim of this study was to develop suitable tests that could be used to measure the sociability of individual cows on commercial farms. A standardised runway test was used as a gold standard test of social motivation and was repeated three times on 46 focal cows. In the runway test, the average latency to reach 5 m and 2 m from the herd and the time spent in these areas were recorded and analysed for repeatability. Latency to reach the 5 m line over the three tests was the most repeatable variable (0.54) and was taken as a measure of social motivation against which to assess other measures of sociability shown by the cows in their home-pen. The home-pen measures were the distance of each cow to the two nearest neighbours, location of the cow in the cow shed, and the level of synchrony based on individual behaviour of each focal cow compared with the rest of the herd's behaviour. Cows that had high latencies to reach the 5 m line had fewer recordings with two near neighbours (W-1 = 5.31, P = 0.021), were less synchronised with the herd (W-1 = 4.82, P = 0.028), were not present at the feedface during peak feeding (W-1 = 4.13, P = 0.042) and stood at the periphery of the cow shed (W-1 = 4.03, P = 0.045). These results indicate that these measures could be used to assess the sociability of individual dairy cows in on-farm Studies. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据