4.6 Article

Rapid transbilayer movement of ceramides in phospholipid vesicles and in human erythrocytes

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 280, 期 27, 页码 25811-25819

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M412052200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The transbilayer diffusion of unlabeled ceramides with different acyl chains ( C-6- Cer, C-10- Cer, and C-16- Cer) was investigated in giant unilamellar vesicles ( GUVs) and in human erythrocytes. Incorporation of a very small percentage of ceramides ( similar to 0.1% of total lipids) to the external leaflet of egg phosphatidylcholine GUVs suffices to trigger a shape change from prolate to pear shape vesicle. By observing the reversibility of this shape change the transmembrane diffusion of lipids was inferred. We found a half- time for unlabeled ceramide flip- flop below 1 min at 37 degrees C. The rapid diffusion of ceramides in a phosphatidylcholine bilayer was confirmed by flip- flop experiments with a spin- labeled ceramide analogue incorporated into large unilamellar vesicles. Shape change experiments were also carried out with human erythrocytes to determine the trans- membrane diffusion of unlabeled ceramides into a biological membrane. Addition of exogenous ceramides to the external leaflet of human erythrocytes did not trigger echinocyte formation immediately as one would anticipate from an asymmetrical accumulation of new amphiphiles in the outer leaflet but only after similar to 15 min of incubation at 20 degrees C in the presence of an excess of ceramide. We interpret these data as being indicative of a rapid ceramide equilibration between both erythrocyte leaflets as indicated also by electron spin resonance spectroscopy with a spin- labeled ceramide. The late appearance of echinocytes could reveal a progressive trapping of a fraction of the ceramide molecules in the outer erythrocytes leaflet. Thus, we cannot exclude the trapping of ceramides into plasma membrane domains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据