4.7 Review

Intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 23, 期 20, 页码 4518-4523

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.22.517

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas (IPMNs) are increasingly recognized in clinical practice. They are a unique clinicopathologic entity that is characterized by mucin production, cystic dilation of the pancreatic ducts, and intraductal papillary growth. Histologically, they may demonstrate a spectrum of cellular atypia ranging from minimal mucinous hyperplasia to frank invasive carcinoma. Similar to invasive ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, patients with IPMN generally present in the seventh or eighth decade of life with the head of the gland being the predominant disease site. The majority of patients are symptomatic at presentation with abdominal pain, weight loss, and diarrhea being the predominant symptoms. Traditionally, the diagnosis was made following an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. However, a cross-sectional imaging study such as a computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging is now the radiological imaging studies of choice. Current thinking suggests that at best IPMN represents a premalignant condition and, as such, surgical intervention should be recommended. The aim should be to resect all gross disease while attempting to achieve a negative surgical margin, which in the majority of cases can be achieved by a partial pancreatectomy. The disease seems to be somewhat indolent with resection of noninvasive disease being curative in the majority of patients with 5- and 10-year actuarial survival rates of 75% and 60% reported. However, up to 50% of cases will have invasive cancer, and for this cohort the prognosis is more guarded. The role of adjuvant therapies is unclear, and further studies are required in this area. (c) 2005 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据