4.7 Article

The impact of lesion side on acute stroke treatment

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 65, 期 1, 页码 81-86

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000167608.94237.aa

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Only a small percentage of patients with acute stroke are treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA). Objective: To investigate why patients with right-hemisphere strokes seem at high risk of not receiving rt-PA. Methods: This study includes two phases. Phase 1: the authors compared demographic, clinical, and outcome measures between patients with right- and left-hemisphere strokes in the rt-PA Registry of Southwestern Ontario (RSWO); Phase 2: the authors tested the hypotheses generated in Phase 1 using the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network (RCSN). A multiple logistic analysis was applied to detect independent predictors of rt-PA administration. Results: Phase 1: of 179 rt-PA- treated patients, 39% had right- hemisphere syndrome. Patients with right- hemisphere strokes had a longer hospital stay ( 15 vs 9 days; p = 0.03). Phase 2: of 990 stroke patients in the RCSN, 505 (51%) had a right- and 485 (49%) a left-hemisphere syndrome. Of 110 rt-PA- treated patients, 37 (34%) had a right- hemisphere syndrome ( p = 0.0001). Negative independent predictors of rt-PA administration were right- hemisphere stroke ( OR, 0.55; CI: 0.31 to 0.96; p = 0.037), onset-to-emergency department time ( OR, 0.99; CI 0.98 to 0.99; p = 0.04), and CNS score ( OR, 0.78; CI 0.71 to 0.86; p < 0.0001). Neglect predicted rt-PA administration ( OR, 2.32; CI 1.29 to 4.16; p = 0.004). Conclusions: Patients with right-hemisphere strokes are 45% less likely to be treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) compared to patients with left-hemisphere strokes. The presence of neglect confers a twofold increased likelihood of rt-PA administration. Prehospital delay and lack of standardized scores for the neglect syndrome may limit accessibility of patients with right-hemisphere stroke to thrombolysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据