4.6 Review

The Madness of Microbiome: Attempting To Find Consensus Best Practice for 16S Microbiome Studies

期刊

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02627-17

关键词

16S RNA; DNA sequencing; microbiome

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) [BB/N016742/1, BB/N01720X/1, BB/K501591/1, BB/J01446X/1, BB/P013732/1, BB/J004235/1, BB/J004243/1]
  2. Scottish Government's Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division (RESAS)
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/N016742/1, BBS/E/D/30002276, BBS/E/D/20002173, BB/N01720X/1, BBS/E/D/20310000, 1358257, 1732232] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. BBSRC [BB/N016742/1, BBS/E/D/20002173, BB/K501591/1, BBS/E/D/20310000, BBS/E/D/30002276, BB/N01720X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development and continuous improvement of high-throughput sequencing platforms have stimulated interest in the study of complex microbial communities. Currently, the most popular sequencing approach to study microbial community composition and dynamics is targeted 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding. To prepare samples for sequencing, there are a variety of processing steps, each with the potential to introduce bias at the data analysis stage. In this short review, key information from the literature pertaining to each processing step is described, and consequently, general recommendations for future 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding experiments are made.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据