4.5 Article

Functional defects due to spacer-region mutations of human mitochondrial DNA polymerase in a family with an ataxia-myopathy syndrome

期刊

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
卷 14, 期 14, 页码 1907-1920

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddi196

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM45295] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Defects of mitochondrial polymerase gamma (POLG) underlie neurological diseases ranging from myopathies to parkinsonism and infantile Alpers syndrome. The most severe manifestations have been associated with mutations of the 'spacer' region of POLG, the function of which has remained unstudied in humans. We identified a family, segregating three POLG amino acid variants, A467T, R627Q and Q1236H. The first two affect the spacer region and the third is a polymorphism, allelic with R627Q. Three grades of disease severity appeared to correlate with the genotypes. The patient with the most severe outcome, cerebellar ataxia syndrome, had all three variants, those with R627Q and Q1236H had juvenile-onset ptosis and gait disturbance and those with a single A467T allele had late-onset ptosis. To evaluate the molecular pathogenesis of these spacer defects, we expressed and purified the mutant proteins and studied their catalytic properties in vitro. The A467T substitution resulted in clearly decreased activity, DNA binding and processivity of the polymerase. Our biochemical data, the dominant manifestation of A467T and its previously reported high frequency in the Belgian population (0.6%), emphasize the role of this mutation as a common cause of neurological disease. Further, biochemical evidence that a polymorphic variant may modify the function of a mutant POLG, if occurring in the same polypeptide, is shown here. Finally, and surprisingly, other pathogenic spacer mutants showed DNA-binding affinities and processivities similar to or higher than the controls, suggesting that the disease-causing mechanisms of spacer mutations extend beyond the basic catalytic functions of POLG.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据