4.7 Article

Observational evidence of the formation of cyanopolyynes in CRL 618 through the polymerization of HCN

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 628, 期 1, 页码 275-282

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/430774

关键词

astrochemistry; circumstellar matter; ISM : molecules; radio lines : stars; stars : AGB and post-AGB; stars : carbon; stars : individual ( CRL 618)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The abundance ratio of consecutive members of the cyanopolyyne family has been explored in CRL 618 using data acquired in a complete line survey covering the frequency range 81-356 GHz. The J(up) range explored for the different molecules is 1-4 for HCN and HNC, 9-39 for HC3N, 31-133 for HC5N, and 72-85 for HC7N ( not detected beyond J(up) 85). The lowest vibrationally excited state of HC7N (v(15) at 62 cm(-1)) has been tentatively detected. Data analysis has been performed by extending our previous geometric and radiative transfer model of the slowly expanding envelope (SEE) surrounding the compact central continuum source of CRL 618, which was established from the study of rotational lines in several vibrationally excited states of HC3N. The new lines analyzed here require modeling of the high-velocity wind (HVW) component and the colder circumstellar gas, a remnant of the AGB phase of CRL 618. The derived HC3N/HC5N and HC5N/HC7N abundance ratios from this set of uniformly calibrated lines are between similar to 3 and 6 in the different regions, similar to standard values in the circumstellar and interstellar media and consistent with previous estimates obtained from ISO observations and chemical models. However, the abundance ratios of HC3N, HC5N, and HC7N with respect to HCN are at least 2 orders of magnitude larger than those typical for AGB C-rich stars, such as IRC + 10216. This fact indicates that in the short transition toward the planetary nebula phase, HCN is quickly reprocessed into longer cyanopolyyne chains. A similar behavior was previously found in this object for the polyacetylenic chains (C2nH2).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据