4.8 Article

Pluronic block copolymers alter apoptotic signal transduction of doxorubicin in drug-resistant cancer cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
卷 105, 期 3, 页码 269-278

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.03.019

关键词

apoptosis; multidrug resistance; pluronic; polymer

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA089225-06, R01 CA089225-05, R01 CA089225-01A1, R01 CA089225-04, CA89225, R01 CA089225-02, R01 CA089225, R01 CA089225-03] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS057748] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pluronic block copolymer P85 (P85) sensitizes multidrug resistant (MDR) cancer cells resulting in the increase of cytotoxic activity of antineoplastic agents. This effect is attributed to the inhibition of the most clinically relevant drug efflux transporter, P-glycoprotein (Pgp), through the combined ATP depletion and inhibition of Pgp ATPase activity. The present study elucidates effects of an anticancer agent, doxorubicin (Dox), formulated with P85 on drug-induced apoptosis in MDR cancer cells. Early and late stages of apoptosis were detected by Annexin V and TUNEL methods, respectively. In parallel experiments, the expression of genes related to apoptosis, BCL2, BCLXL, BAX, P53, APAF1, Caspase 3, and Caspase 9, was determined by RTPCR. The obtained data suggest that Dox/P85 formulation induces apoptosis in the resistant cancer cells more efficiently than free Dox. The treatment of the cells with Dox alone simultaneously activated a proapoptotic signal and an antiapoptotic cellular defense. Therefore, the apoptosis induction by Dox was substantially limited. In contrast, the treatment of the cells with Dox/P85 formulation significantly enhanced the proapoptotic activity of the drug and prevented the activation of the antiapoptotic cellular defense. This is likely to result in the stronger cytotoxic response of the resistant cells to the Dox/P85 formulation compared to the free drug. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据