4.6 Article

Potential Contribution of Anammox to Nitrogen Loss from Paddy Soils in Southern China

期刊

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 81, 期 3, 页码 938-947

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02664-14

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [41090282]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB15020300, XDB15020400]
  3. International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China [2011DFB91710]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The anaerobic oxidation of ammonium (anammox) process has been observed in diverse terrestrial ecosystems, while the contribution of anammox to N-2 production in paddy soils is not well documented. In this study, the anammox activity and the abundance and diversity of anammox bacteria were investigated to assess the anammox potential of 12 typical paddy soils collected in southern China. Anammox bacteria related to Candidatus Brocadia and Candidatus Kuenenia and two novel unidentified clusters were detected, with Candidatus Brocadia comprising 50% of the anammox population. The prevalence of the anammox was confirmed by the quantitative PCR results based on hydrazine synthase (hzsB) genes, which showed that the abundance ranged from 1.16 x 10(4) to 9.65 x 10(4) copies per gram of dry weight. The anammox rates measured by the isotope-pairing technique ranged from 0.27 to 5.25 nmol N per gram of soil per hour in these paddy soils, which contributed 0.6 to 15% to soil N-2 production. It is estimated that a total loss of 2.50 x 10(6) Mg N per year is linked to anammox in the paddy fields in southern China, which implied that ca. 10% of the applied ammonia fertilizers is lost via the anammox process. Anammox activity was significantly correlated with the abundance of hzsB genes, soil nitrate concentration, and C/N ratio. Additionally, ammonia concentration and pH were found to be significantly correlated with the anammox bacterial structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据