4.6 Article

Pyruvate-Associated Acid Resistance in Bacteria

期刊

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 80, 期 14, 页码 4108-4113

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01001-14

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [C010301]
  2. Basic Research Program of Shenzhen [JCYJ20120614155650545]
  3. National Program on Key Basic Research Project [2014CB745200]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glucose confers acid resistance on exponentially growing bacteria by repressing formation of the cyclic AMP (cAMP)-cAMP receptor protein (CRP) complex and consequently activating acid resistance genes. Therefore, in a glucose-rich growth environment, bacteria are capable of resisting acidic stresses due to low levels of cAMP-CRP. Here we reveal a second mechanism for glucose-conferred acid resistance. We show that glucose induces acid resistance in exponentially growing bacteria through pyruvate, the glycolysis product. Pyruvate and/or the downstream metabolites induce expression of the small noncoding RNA (sncRNA) Spot42, and the sncRNA, in turn, activates expression of the master regulator of acid resistance, RpoS. In contrast to glucose, pyruvate has little effect on levels of the cAMP-CRP complex and does not require the complex for its effects on acid resistance. Another important difference between glucose and pyruvate is that pyruvate can be produced by bacteria. This means that bacteria have the potential to protect themselves from acidic stresses by controlling glucose-derived generation of pyruvate, pyruvate-acetate efflux, or reversion from acetate to pyruvate. We tested this possibility by shutting down pyruvate-acetate efflux and found that the resulting accumulation of pyruvate elevated acid resistance. Many sugars can be broken into glucose, and the subsequent glycolysis generates pyruvate. Therefore, pyruvate-associated acid resistance is not confined to glucose-grown bacteria but is functional in bacteria grown on various sugars.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据