4.5 Article

Protein secretion systems in Fusobacterium nucleatum:: Genomic identification of Type 4 piliation and complete Type V pathways brings new insight into mechanisms of pathogenesis

期刊

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-BIOMEMBRANES
卷 1713, 期 2, 页码 92-112

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2005.05.002

关键词

protein secretion; Type V secretion pathway; autotransporter; two-partner secretion system; YadA-like autotransporter; fusobacteriurn; Type 4pili

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent genomic analyses of the two sequenced strains F nucleatum subsp. nucleatum ATCC 25586 and F nucleatum subsp. vincentii ATCC 49256 suggested that the major protein secretion systems were absent. However, such a paucity of protein secretion systems is incongruous with F nucleatum pathogenesis. Moreover, the presence of one or more such systems has been described for every other Gram-negative organism sequenced to date. In this investigation, the question of protein secretion in F nucleatum was revisited. In the current study, the absence in F. nucleatum of a twin-arginine translocation system (TC #2.A.64.), a Type III secretion system (TC #3.A.6.), a Type IV secretion system (TC #3.A.7.) and a chaperone/usher pathway (TC #1.13.11.) was confirmed. However, contrary to previous findings, our investigations indicated that a Type I protein secretion system was also absent from F nucleatum. In contrast, members of the holin family (TC #1.E) and the machinery required for a Type 4 piliation/fimbriation system (TC #3.A.15.2.) were identified using a variety of bioinformatic tools. Furthermore, a complete range of proteins resembling members of the Type V secretion pathway, i.e., the Type Va (autotransporter; TC #1.B.12.), Type Vb (two-partner secretion system; TIC #1.B.20.) and Type Vc (YadA-like trimeric autotransporter; TIC #1.B.42.), was found. This work provides new insight into the protein secretion and virulence mechanisms of F nucleatum. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据