4.0 Article

Risk of malignancy in scleroderma - A population-based cohort study

期刊

ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM
卷 52, 期 8, 页码 2415-2424

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/art.21225

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CN-75064A-29] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAMS NIH HHS [N01-AR-2217] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To determine the incidence of cancer in patients with scleroderma (systemic sclerosis) and to compare those rates with cancer rates in the local population. Methods. Cancer risk in scleroderma patients in the Detroit metropolitan area was assessed by linking patient identification codes of the Michigan Scleroderma Registry to the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System database. Patients were screened between the years 1973 and 2002, with additional follow-up to 2004. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated for selected malignancies (lung, liver, colon, breast, cervical, and prostate cancers, and nonHodgkin's lymphomas), with stratification by sex and race. Results. Of 934 patients in the Scleroderma Registry, 538 were included in the study based on tri-county residency (436 females and 102 males). Of these, 45 first malignancies were noted (37 females and 8 males). Lung cancer (10 cases) was found to be the most common cancer in scleroderma patients. However, its incidence was not significantly different from that in the general population of metropolitan Detroit (SIR 1.23). Other types of cancer were examined, and no significant differences were found as compared with the rates in the local population, with I exception: black females with scleroderma had significantly higher rates of liver cancer (SIR 45.8). Conclusion. Contrary to previous studies, this study did not find statistical evidence of an increased incidence of cancer in scleroderma patients, except for liver cancer. One possible reason is the high background rates of certain cancers in the metropolitan Detroit area. It may be necessary to consider local cancer rates when comparing different scleroderma cohorts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据