4.7 Article

A functional survey of the enhancer activity of conserved non-coding sequences from vertebrate Iroquois cluster gene deserts

期刊

GENOME RESEARCH
卷 15, 期 8, 页码 1061-1072

出版社

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gr.4004805

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent Studies of the genome architecture of vertebrates have uncovered two unforeseen aspects of its organization. First, large regions of the genome, called gene deserts, are devoid of protein-coding sequences and have no obvious biological role. Second, comparative genomics has highlighted the existence of an array of highly conserved non-coding regions [HCNR]s ill all vertebrates. Most Surprisingly, these structural features are strongly associated with genes that have essential functions during development. Among these, the vertebrate Iroquois (Irx) genes stand Out on both fronts. Mammalian Irx genes are organized in two clusters (IrxA and IrxB) that span >1 Mb each with no other genes interspersed. Additionally, a large number of HCNRs exist within IrX Clusters. We have systematically examined the enhancer activity of HCNRs from the IrxB Cluster using transgenic Xenopus and zebrafish embryos. Most of these HCNRs are active in subdomains of endogenous Irx expression, and some are candidates to contain shared enhancers of neighboring genes, which could explain the evolutionary conservation of Irx Clusters. furthermore, HCNRs present in tetrapod IrxB but not in fish may be responsible for novel Irx expression domains that appeared after their divergence. Finally, we have performed a more detailed analysis oil two IrxB Ultraconserved non-coding regions (UCRs) duplicated in IrxA Clusters ill similar relative positions. These four regions share a core re.-ion highly conserved among all of them and drive expression ill similar domains. However, inter-species conserved sequences Surrounding the core, specific for each of these UCRs, are able to modulate their expression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据