4.6 Article

An N-Acyl Homoserine Lactone Synthase in the Ammonia-Oxidizing Bacterium Nitrosospira multiformis

期刊

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 80, 期 3, 页码 951-958

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.03361-13

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41371266, 21377157, 21177145]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences,
  3. Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment of China [2012ZX07209-003]
  4. National Key Technology R&D Program of China [2013BAD11B03-3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The chemolithoautotrophic bacterium Nitrosospira multiformis is involved in affecting the process of nitrogen cycling. Here we report the existence and characterization of a functional quorum sensing signal synthase in N. multiformis. One gene (nmuI) playing a role in generating a protein with high levels of similarity to N-acyl homoserine lactone (AHL) synthase protein families was identified. Two AHLs (C-14-AHL and 3-oxo-C-14-AHL) were detected using an AHL biosensor and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) when nmuI, producing a LuxI homologue, was introduced into Escherichia coli. However, by extracting N. multiformis culture supernatants with acidified ethyl acetate, no AHL product was obtained that was capable of activating the biosensor or being detected by LC-MS. According to reverse transcription-PCR, the nmuI gene is transcribed in N. multiformis, and a LuxR homolog (NmuR) in this ammonia-oxidizing strain showed great sensitivity to long-chain AHL signals by solubility assay. A degradation experiment demonstrated that the absence of AHL signals might be attributed to the possible AHL-inactivating activities of this strain. To summarize, an AHL synthase gene (nmuI) acting as a long-chain AHL producer has been found in a chemolithotrophic ammonia-oxidizing microorganism, and the results provide an opportunity to complete the knowledge of the regulatory networks in N. multiformis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据