4.5 Article

Inhospital and 1-year mortality of patients who develop worsening renal function following acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction

期刊

AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL
卷 150, 期 2, 页码 330-337

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.09.055

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Recent studies have emphasized the prognostic value of baseline creatinine or estimated creatinine clearance in the setting of acute coronary syndromes. However, the prevalence and prognostic significance of worsening, renal function (WRF) in patients with acute ST-elevation, myocardial infarction are unknown. Methods We studied 1038 patients presenting with acute ST-elevation infarction. WRF was defined as an increase of: > 0.5 mg/dL in creatinine level at any point during hospital stay. The relation between WRF and subsequent inhospital and 1-year mortality was analyzed by use of multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models, respectively, controlling for covariates. Results WRF occurred in 98 (9.6%) patients during hospital stay. Baseline renal dysfunction (calculated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min) and WRF were strong independent predictors of inhospital mortality (adjusted odds ratios 2.8, 95% Cl 1.3-5.9; and 11.4, 95% Cl 6.6-19.5, respectively). In a Cox multivariate analysis, both baseline renal dysfunction (adjusted hazard ratio 2.8, 95% Cl 1.6-4.9) and WRF (adjusted hazard ratio 7.2, 95% CI 4.9-10.4) remained independent predictors of 1-year mortality. WRF provided incremental prognostic value toward the prediction of 1-year mortality when added to clinical risk predictors and baseline renal function. The increased mortality associated with impaired baseline renal function was largely caused by events occurring in patients with WRF. Conclusion WRF occurring during admission for ST-elevation myocardial infarction is a powerful and independent predictor of inhospital and 1-year mortality. Small elevations of serum creatinine may serve as a simple marker to identify patients at a very high risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据