4.3 Article

Cloning and characterization of a novel immunogenic protein 3 (NIP3) from Brugia malayi by immuno screening of a phage-display cDNA expression library

期刊

PARASITOLOGY RESEARCH
卷 97, 期 1, 页码 49-58

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00436-005-1375-x

关键词

Brugia malayi; NIP3; EN; phage-display; biopanning

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI-39066, R01 AI039066, AI-02642, R29 AI039066] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Iterative screening of a phage display cDNA expression library of the third-stage larvae (L3) of Brugia malayi with sera from putatively immune individuals (endemic normal, EN) identified a novel clone with insert showing significant homology to Onchocerca volvulus novel immunogenic protein-3 (Ov-NIP3) gene and Caenorhabditis elegans NIP3-like protein and hence the gene was designated Brugia malayi NIP3-like protein (BmNIP3). EST database analysis showed that ESTs from several gastrointestinal nematodes such as Ancylostoma caninum, Teladorsagia circumcincta, Haemonchus contortus and Strongyloides stercoralis has BmNIP3 homologues, but the gene has not been described from these parasites. Sequence analyses showed that BmNIP3 has three potential mucin-type O-glycosylation sites and several serine/threonine phosphorylation sites. As expected, BmNIP3 protein isolated from the parasite was serine/threonine phosphorylated. Further analyses showed that BmNIP3 is differentially transcribed, with highest level of expression present in the larval (L3 and L4) stages. Mice immunized with rBmNIP3 developed strong antibody responses predominantly of the IgG1 and IgG2a subtype. A similar analyses of the sera samples from EN individuals showed that they also carry high levels of IgG1 and IgG2 antibodies against BmNIP3, whereas, chronically infected patients carry largely IgG3 antibodies and MF individuals carry high levels of IgG1 antibodies against BmNIP3. This study thus describes a novel protein from B. malayi that appears to be highly immunogenic in both humans and mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据