4.7 Article

Participating in social activities helps preserve cognitive function:: an analysis of a longitudinal, population-based study of the elderly

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 34, 期 4, 页码 864-871

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyi049

关键词

cognitive impairment; cognitive function; social networks; social activity; social contact; Taiwan

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [R01 AG 16790, R01 AG 16661] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [P30 HD 32030] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background This study examines how changes in cognition over time are related to participation in social activities and the extent of social networks. Methods Data are drawn from a population-based, longitudinal study that began in 1989 among elderly Taiwanese. An over-dispersed Poisson model is used to regress the number of failed cognitive tasks (0-5) in 1996, 1999, and 2000 on prior measures of cognitive impairment, social activities, social networks, health status, and sociodemographic characteristics. The analysis sample comprises 2387 individuals, who contribute a total of 4603 observations across three survey intervals (1993-96, 1996-99, 1999-2000). Results After adjusting for prior cognitive impairment, baseline health status, and sociodemographic factors, respondents who participated in one or two social activities failed 13% fewer cognitive tasks (P < 0.01) than those with no social activities; those who engaged in three or more activities failed 33% fewer cognitive tasks (P < 0.001). In contrast, none of the social network measures was related to cognitive impairment. Conclusions Despite a social structure where elderly persons often live with their children and social interaction is likely to be more family-centered than in western countries, data from Taiwan suggest that participation in social activities outside the family may have a bigger impact on cognitive function than social contacts with family or non-relatives.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据