4.4 Article

Dronabinol and marijuana in HIV plus marijuana smokers: acute effects on caloric intake and mood

期刊

PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 181, 期 1, 页码 170-178

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-005-2242-2

关键词

cannabinoids; AIDS; THC; appetite

资金

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [DA12698, DA 09236] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale: No studies to date have directly compared the tolerability and efficacy of smoked marijuana and oral dronabinol in HIV+ marijuana smokers. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare dronabinol (0, 10, 20, 30 mg p.o.) and marijuana [0.0, 1.8, 2.8, 3.9% Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)] in two samples of HIV+ marijuana smokers: those with (n-15) and those without (n=15) a clinically significant loss of muscle mass (< 90% body cell mass/height), which is one component of AIDS wasting. Methods: Mood, physical symptoms, self-selected food intake, cardiovascular data, and cognitive task performance were measured before and repeatedly after dronabinol and marijuana administration in eight 7-h sessions. Marijuana and dronabinol were administered in randomized order using a within-subject, staggered, double-dummy design. Results: As compared to placebo, (1) marijuana (1.8, 2.8, 3.9% THC) and the lower dronabinol doses (10, 20 mg) were well tolerated (e.g., few physical symptoms, significant increases in ratings of good drug effect) in both groups of participants; the highest dose of dronabinol (30 mg) was poorly tolerated in a subset of participants; (2) marijuana and dronabinol significantly increased caloric intake in the low bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) group but not in the normal BIA group; and (3) drug effects on cognitive performance were minor. Conclusions: These data suggest that for experienced marijuana smokers with clinically significant muscle mass loss, both dronabinol (at acute doses at least four to eight times the current recommendation) and marijuana produce substantial and comparable increases in food intake without producing adverse effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据