4.7 Review

Computational cluster validation in post-genomic data analysis

期刊

BIOINFORMATICS
卷 21, 期 15, 页码 3201-3212

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti517

关键词

-

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [E19354] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [E19354] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Motivation: The discovery of novel biological knowledge from the ab initio analysis of post-genomic data relies upon the use of unsupervised processing methods, in particular clustering techniques. Much recent research in bioinformatics has therefore been focused on the transfer of clustering methods introduced in other scientific fields and on the development of novel algorithms specifically designed to tackle the challenges posed by post-genomic data. The partitions returned by a clustering algorithm are commonly validated using visual inspection and concordance with prior biological knowledge-whether the clusters actually correspond to the real structure in the data is somewhat less frequently considered. Suitable computational cluster validation techniques are available in the general data-mining literature, but have been given only a fraction of the same attention in bioinformatics. Results: This review paper aims to familiarize the reader with the battery of techniques available for the validation of clustering results, with a particular focus on their application to post-genomic data analysis. Synthetic and real biological datasets are used to demonstrate the benefits, and also some of the perils, of analytical clustervalidation. Availability: The software used in the experiments is available at http://dbkweb.ch.umist.ac.uk/handl/clustervalidation/ Contact: J.Handl@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk Supplementary information: Enlarged colour plots are provided in the Supplementary Material, which is available at http://dbkweb.ch.umist.ac.uk/handl/clustervalidation/

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据