4.6 Article

Stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas: Analysis of 317 patients followed more than 5 years

期刊

NEUROSURGERY
卷 57, 期 2, 页码 257-263

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000166542.00512.84

关键词

acoustic neuroma; gamma knife; long-term results; radiosurgery; vestibular schwannoma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Many investigators have reported successful treatment of vestibular schwannomas with gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS). However, long-term outcomes should be evaluated before concluding that GKRS is truly safe and effective for the treatment of vestibular schwannomas. Methods: Between May 1991 and December 1998, 346 consecutive patients (excluding those presenting with neurofibromatosis Type 2) were treated with GKRS. Of these, 317 patients were assessed: Twenty-nine patients were lost to follow-up within 5 years. Results: The median follow-up period was 7.8 years. Of 301 patients who underwent serial follow-up imaging, two (1%) experienced complete remission, 184 (61%) experienced partial remission, 93 (31%) had stable tumors, and 22 (7%) experienced treatment failure. The actuarial 5- or 10-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 93 and 92%, respectively. Tumors less than 15 cm(3) in volume (10-yr PFS, 96%; P<0.001) or which did not compress the brainstem and deviate the fourth ventricle (10-yr PFS, 97%; P=0.008) resulted in significantly better PFS rates. Failure of treatment usually occurred within 3 years. When the tumor was treated with a marginal dose of 13 Gy or less, the hearing preservation rate was 68%, transient facial palsy developed at a rate of 1%, and facial numbness developed at a rate of 2%. Conclusion: GKRS proved to be a safe and effective treatment for patients followed longer than 5 years who presented with tumors with a volume of less than 15 cm(3) and who did not have significant fourth ventricle deviation. Good functional outcomes were observed in this group of patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据