4.6 Article

Short-Read Sequencing for Genomic Analysis of the Brown Rot Fungus Fibroporia radiculosa

期刊

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 78, 期 7, 页码 2272-2281

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.06745-11

关键词

-

资金

  1. Lucas Biodeterioration Laboratory (Department of Forest Products, Mississippi State University)
  2. Life Sciences and Biotechnology Institute (Mississippi State University)
  3. Wood Utilization Research (USDA)
  4. National Science Foundation [NSF EPS-0903787]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The feasibility of short-read sequencing for genomic analysis was demonstrated for Fibroporia radiculosa, a copper-tolerant fungus that causes brown rot decay of wood. The effect of read quality on genomic assembly was assessed by filtering Illumina GAIIx reads from a single run of a paired-end library (75-nucleotide read length and 300-bp fragment size) at three different stringency levels and then assembling each data set with Velvet. A simple approach was devised to determine which filter stringency was best. Venn diagrams identified the regions containing reads that were used in an assembly but were of a low-enough quality to be removed by a filter. By plotting base quality histograms of reads in this region, we judged whether a filter was too stringent or not stringent enough. Our best assembly had a genome size of 33.6 Mb, an N50 of 65.8 kb for a k-mer of 51, and a maximum contig length of 347 kb. Using GeneMark, 9,262 genes were predicted. TargetP and SignalP analyses showed that among the 1,213 genes with secreted products, 986 had motifs for signal peptides and 227 had motifs for signal anchors. Blast2GO analysis provided functional annotation for 5,407 genes. We identified 29 genes with putative roles in copper tolerance and 73 genes for lignocellulose degradation. A search for homologs of these 102 genes showed that F. radiculosa exhibited more similarity to Postia placenta than Serpula lacrymans. Notable differences were found, however, and their involvements in copper tolerance and wood decay are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据