4.7 Article

Salt stress-induced lipid peroxidation is reduced by glutathione S-transferase, but this reduction of lipid peroxides is not enough for a recovery of root growth in Arabidopsis

期刊

PLANT SCIENCE
卷 169, 期 2, 页码 369-373

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.03.030

关键词

Arabidopsis thaliana; glutathione S-transferase; peroxidation; reactive oxygen species (ROS); root growth; salt stress

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reactive oxygen species (ROS)-related membrane lipid peroxidation in the root of Arabidopsis thaliana was fluorescently visualized and investigated under salt stress. In the control roots without salt stress, more fluorescence was observed in the elongating region than in the meristematic region. Salt stress of 100 mM NaCl enhanced the fluorescence in both, indicating that salt stress-induced ROS, and consequently membrane lipid peroxidation. In transgenic tobacco glutathione S-transferase over-expressing Arabidopsis (the parB plants), less fluorescence was observed than in the non-transgenic control plants. In the salt-stressed parB plant roots, the fluorescent brightness was reduced to 46% of that of the non-transgenic plant in the meristematic region. However, the inhibition of root growth was not improved in parB plants under salt stress at pH 5.7. That is, 100 mM of salt stress reduced the root growth to 40% or less both in the parent control plants and the parB plants. The root tissue osmotic pressure was almost the same between the two tested lines, which may be one of the reasons why no difference was observed in root growth between the two lines. These results suggested that salt stress-induced oxidative stress, and the introduction/overexpression of a glutathione S-transferase gene may have reduced the amount of ROS but the removal of ROS was not sufficient to effect salt tolerance because salt stress also caused an osmotic imbalance reducing the root growth. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据