4.5 Article

Inverse analysis of upward water flow in a groundwater table lysimeter

期刊

VADOSE ZONE JOURNAL
卷 4, 期 3, 页码 558-572

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2004.0118

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The accuracy of numerical water flow models for the vadose zone depends on the estimation of the soil hydraulic properties. In this study, the hydraulic parameters for a silty clay soil in a large lysimeter determined through inverse modeling of a fallow period with upward water flow from a shallow groundwater table. Parameter was studied by simulating a hypothetical soil with known hydraulic properties under comparable conditions. Sensitivity analysis showed that the pressure head h(z,t), the volumetric water content theta(z,t), and the cumulative bottom flux Q(t) were least sensitive to the residual volumetric water content theta(r) and the pore-connectivity parameter lambda in the van Genuchten-Mualem (VGM) model. Parameter response surfaces showed that least squares fitting with theta(z,t) data is more likely to result in a unique hydraulic parameter set than least squares fitting with h(z,t) or Q(t) data. With only theta(z,t) in the objective function, the least squares minimization algorithm was capable of finding the correct soil hydraulic parameters, provided that theta(r) and lambda were fixed and that multiple initial parameter estimates were used. The protocol that was developed for the hypothetical soil was subsequently applied to the actual groundwater table lysimeter. The soil hydraulic parameters for the lysimeter for two (x,y) locations were determined using theta(z,t) data as measured by capacitance sensors. The variability in the optimized inverse of the air-entry value alpha and the saturated hydraulic conductivity K-s in the VGM model was relatively high because of the high parameter correlation between these parameters. The optimized soil hydraulic properties can be used to study capillary rise from the groundwater table.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据