4.6 Article

Diversity and Abundance of Single-Stranded DNA Viruses in Human Feces

期刊

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 77, 期 22, 页码 8062-8070

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.06331-11

关键词

-

资金

  1. Korea Food & Drug Administration [09172KFDA996]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [2011-0005513, 2011-0028854]
  3. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST)
  4. Hi Seoul Science (humanities) fellowship
  5. Seoul Scholarship Foundation
  6. National Research Foundation of Korea [2011-0028854, 2010-0002571] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we investigated the abundance and diversity of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) viruses in fecal samples from five healthy individuals through a combination of serial filtration and CsCl gradient ultracentrifugation. Virus abundance ranged from 108 to 109 per gram of feces, and virus-to-bacterium ratios were much lower (less than 0.1) than those observed in aquatic environments (5 to 10). Viral DNA was extracted and randomly amplified using phi29 polymerase and analyzed through high-throughput 454 pyrosequencing. Among 400,133 sequences, an average of 86.2% viromes were previously uncharacterized in public databases. Among previously known viruses, double-stranded DNA podophages (52 to 74%), siphophages (11 to 30%), myophages (1 to 4%), and ssDNA microphages (3 to 9%) were major constituents of human fecal viromes. A phylogenetic analysis of 24 large contigs of microphages based on conserved capsid protein sequences revealed five distinct newly discovered evolutionary microphage groups that were distantly related to previously known microphages. Moreover, putative capsid protein sequences of five contigs were closely related to prophage-like sequences in the genomes of three Bacteroides and three Prevotella strains, suggesting that Bacteroides and Prevotella are the sources of infecting microphages in their hosts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据