4.4 Article

Treatment of testicular cancer: Influence on pituitary-gonadal axis and sexual function

期刊

UROLOGY
卷 66, 期 2, 页码 402-406

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.03.050

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives. To investigate the influence of treatment for testicular cancer on the pituitary-gonadal axis and sexual function in long-time survivors after unilateral orchiectomy. Methods. Blood was drawn from patients treated for testicular cancer during routine oncologic follow-up for measurement of luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, sexual hormone-binding globulin, testosterone, and bioavailable testosterone. Sexual function was evaluated using the International Index of Erectile Function 15-item (IIEF-15) questionnaire. Patients were grouped according to treatment: group 1 followed a surveillance strategy, group 2 received two cycles of carboplatin monotherapy, and group 3 underwent cisplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin chemotherapy. Results. No statistically significant difference was found in the serum hormonal levels among the three groups, and all hormonal levels were within the 95% confidence range, except for follicle-stimulating hormone. The median serum testosterone level was 3.5 ng/mL in group 1, 3.9 ng/mL in group 2, and 4.2 ng/mL in group 3. In group 1, the median 'IIEF-15 score was 64.0, and the median Erectile Function (EF) domain score was 28. The median scores in groups 2 and 3 were 62.5 for IIEF-15 and 27.5 for EF and 65.0 for IIEF-15 and 30.0 for EF, respectively. No correlation was found between testosterone level and IIEF-15 or EF score. Conclusions. None of the treatments investigated had a significant influence on the serum hormonal levels in long-time survivors of testicular cancer. Patients undergoing chemotherapy have no greater risk of developing a hormonal disorder than those following a surveillance strategy, and therapy for testicular cancer is not a risk factor for erectile dysfunction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据