4.2 Article

Diversity and assembly of weed communities:: contrasting responses across cropping systems

期刊

WEED RESEARCH
卷 45, 期 4, 页码 303-315

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3180.2005.00459.x

关键词

weed seedbank; weed diversity; species richness; species evenness; conservation tillage; crop rotation; no-till

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diversity and weed community composition of mid-season plant stands and autumn seedbanks were examined in spring barley-red clover cropping systems that varied according to crop rotation, tillage and weed management. Weed plant and seed density data collected over 4 years were used in the calculation of species richness (number of species), evenness (Shannon's E) and diversity (Shannon's H'), and in multivariate analysis (canonical discriminant analysis) of weed communities. Weed diversity indices were low (H' < 2.0) but sensitive to management practices. Evenness had intermediate values (E = 0.4-0.8), suggesting little evidence of truly dominant species, particularly in the seedbanks. The difference in the number of species between treatments was never large (approximately two to four species). Overall, diversity indices were highest in the low disturbance treatments, particularly those with minimum weed management. Factors affecting ordination were somewhat different from those affecting diversity. Tillage had little effect on weed diversity indices but had a more major role in determining weed community composition. Seed-banks in no-till and monoculture-chisel plough treatments appeared to have more distinctive species composition compared with other treatments. Weed species assembly in seedbanks showed little discrimination across treatments and over time, confirming the ability of seedbanks to buffer disturbances across a variety of cropping systems. The use of diversity indices revealed part of the complexity of weed communities associated with disturbance in cropping systems, whereas ordination singled out species-cropping systems associations, which may be more meaningful to weed management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据