4.6 Article

Promiscuous initiation on mammalian chromosomal DNA templates and its possible suppression by transcription

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH
卷 308, 期 1, 页码 53-64

出版社

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2005.04.012

关键词

initiation; transcription regulation; dihydrofolate reductase

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM26108] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Chinese hamster dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) origin consists of many inefficient initiation sites scattered throughout a 55-kb intergenic spacer, with the ori-beta, ori-beta', and ori-gamma subregions being preferred. To test for the presence of genetic replicators within these subregions, fragments containing ori-beta, ori-beta', or, as a negative control, a fragment from the DHFR gene that never initiates in loco were placed at ectopic chromosomal positions. Two-dimensional gel analysis demonstrates that initiation occurs in all three fragments, including the fragment from the gene, and appears to occur at different positions within each fragment in different cells in the population. However, initiation is not detectable in the adjacent, transcribed, neomycin-resistance marker. When a cosmid containing an active DHFR gene was inserted into an ectopic chromosomal site, initiation could no longer be observed in the body of the gene, but was clearly evident in the transcriptionally-silent bacterial vector sequences. In the thirteen independent chromosomal positions into which the four different constructs were inserted, initiation occurred in early S-phase. Since these loci necessarily had to be permissive for transcription of the neo(r) marker or DHFR gene used to select transfectants, it is possible that early-firing origin activity and local transcription are somehow linked. In total, these data suggest that potential initiation sites are distributed at very frequent intervals in the mammalian genome, with usage being regulated both positively and negatively by local transcription. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据